Personal advice
The 1995 Winston Churchill is so concentrated, full-bodied and bursting with mineral energy and acidity that you could easily mistake it blind for the 1996. But 1995 is actually even better.
In this vintage, the finesse and charm of the cuvée meet a full body, intense aromas and concentrated density.
Tom Hewitt wrote in Decanter: “This pitch perfect Churchill was the Wine of the tasting.”
Beside apple, mirabelle plum and red berry aromas, it already shows riper notes of hazelnut, gingerbread and honey, yet it still has decades ahead of it. The perlage is fine but intense.
1995 followed four difficult years in Champagne. The vintage is even and very good, so all houses released their best champagnes as 1995. For a long time 1995 stood in the shadow of 1996, the first vintage universally marketed as the “vintage of the century”.
Over time, 1995 is proving to be the better – or at least the more harmonious – vintage in the foreseeable future. The acidity is high, but much better integrated than in the following year.
Spring began mild with an early bud burst. At the end of April vegetation was slowed by cold, and in early May there were even frost damages. Flowering therefore started a little late in June. Light coulure (flower drop) and millerandage (small berries) led to natural yield reduction and higher concentration.
July and August were dry and warm. The berries remained small with good sugar-acid balance. September was sunny but rather cool, so the grapes ripened slowly. The weather stayed dry, giving winemakers time to harvest perfectly ripe grapes in several passes.
1995 is one of the rare years that delivered good yields because of many berries, yet the berries themselves were small, resulting in wonderfully concentrated musts.
Today 1995 shows wonderfully complex aromas and has established itself as a great vintage.